<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Death of the Animator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:59:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: THAT Animeblog - [LWC 65] Serendipity Notion Revisited</title>
		<link>http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-10154</link>
		<dc:creator>THAT Animeblog - [LWC 65] Serendipity Notion Revisited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-10154</guid>
		<description>[...] having read this post, and after observing a certain prevailing trend amongst entries and comments around my familiar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] having read this post, and after observing a certain prevailing trend amongst entries and comments around my familiar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexius</title>
		<link>http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-9868</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-9868</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I understand what you are referring to. It&#039;s one of the reasons why I despised my High School English classes (not to mention any of the other english classes that had some sort of analysis of literature preceding that, but my memory isn&#039;t as good as it used to be, so let&#039;s leave those aside for now). Books were taken a bit too analytically, scraping out a great, great deal of allusions and other sorts of literature devices that most likely did not exist there in the first place and are the product of scholarly ideals and the &quot;author&#039;s intentions.&quot; I tend to watch, or read, stories on sort of a borderline position, both watching for their motifs and themes and just what the author is attempting to deliver to us with all of the story elements (because nothing is just done without purpose, even if it wasn&#039;t intentional and perhaps subconscious) and plot devices or characters as well as taking the story for what it is: entertainment. The better a story can meet at both sides of the wall, the more likely I&#039;d enjoy it. 

I think a good example of this sort of anime would be Blood+. Blood+ was a great watch if you like action and intense scenes of blood (heh), but I found that the foundation was there for it to be taken more than just a source of action-based entertainment. There were a great deal of connections I could make to literature, and even then, the virtues and messages being delivered within such a gruesome show were unimaginably true and honorable. The show managed to break almost every vampire-related or other such story-related cliche in the book and created a very interesting juxtaposition of characters and events. All of the great devices of literature are there, if you watch for them.

So, I see your point and I agree. Anime, books, movies... any of those and more. Your line of thinking applies to them all.

Good post!

~Alexius</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I understand what you are referring to. It&#8217;s one of the reasons why I despised my High School English classes (not to mention any of the other english classes that had some sort of analysis of literature preceding that, but my memory isn&#8217;t as good as it used to be, so let&#8217;s leave those aside for now). Books were taken a bit too analytically, scraping out a great, great deal of allusions and other sorts of literature devices that most likely did not exist there in the first place and are the product of scholarly ideals and the &#8220;author&#8217;s intentions.&#8221; I tend to watch, or read, stories on sort of a borderline position, both watching for their motifs and themes and just what the author is attempting to deliver to us with all of the story elements (because nothing is just done without purpose, even if it wasn&#8217;t intentional and perhaps subconscious) and plot devices or characters as well as taking the story for what it is: entertainment. The better a story can meet at both sides of the wall, the more likely I&#8217;d enjoy it. </p>
<p>I think a good example of this sort of anime would be Blood+. Blood+ was a great watch if you like action and intense scenes of blood (heh), but I found that the foundation was there for it to be taken more than just a source of action-based entertainment. There were a great deal of connections I could make to literature, and even then, the virtues and messages being delivered within such a gruesome show were unimaginably true and honorable. The show managed to break almost every vampire-related or other such story-related cliche in the book and created a very interesting juxtaposition of characters and events. All of the great devices of literature are there, if you watch for them.</p>
<p>So, I see your point and I agree. Anime, books, movies&#8230; any of those and more. Your line of thinking applies to them all.</p>
<p>Good post!</p>
<p>~Alexius</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;lelangiric&#8221; &#187; test</title>
		<link>http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-9563</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;lelangiric&#8221; &#187; test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-9563</guid>
		<description>[...] having read this post, and after observing a certain prevailing trend amongst entries and comments around my familiar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] having read this post, and after observing a certain prevailing trend amongst entries and comments around my familiar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;lelangiric&#8221; &#187; Serendipity in our semiosis, serendipity in our hermeneutics: The Abundance of Meaning Part 2</title>
		<link>http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-9561</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;lelangiric&#8221; &#187; Serendipity in our semiosis, serendipity in our hermeneutics: The Abundance of Meaning Part 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-9561</guid>
		<description>[...] having read this post, and after observing a certain prevailing trend amongst entries and comments around my familiar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] having read this post, and after observing a certain prevailing trend amongst entries and comments around my familiar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fan-pandying (or: how I learned to stop worrying and love the Zero) &#124; Super Fanicom</title>
		<link>http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-9529</link>
		<dc:creator>Fan-pandying (or: how I learned to stop worrying and love the Zero) &#124; Super Fanicom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-9529</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m not going to presume to know the creative forces&#8217; intentions, and it doesn&#8217;t matter anyway. But I like to imagine that the thought process went something like this: &#8220;Hey, why [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m not going to presume to know the creative forces&#8217; intentions, and it doesn&#8217;t matter anyway. But I like to imagine that the thought process went something like this: &#8220;Hey, why [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shana, Margery Daw, and Freud&#8217;s favorite moe &#124; Super Fanicom</title>
		<link>http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-9325</link>
		<dc:creator>Shana, Margery Daw, and Freud&#8217;s favorite moe &#124; Super Fanicom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 01:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-9325</guid>
		<description>[...] that taking the author&#8217;s opinion into consideration at all is a critical faux pas; after all, the (ubiquitous) author is (figuratively) dead. But I think I can get away with it for three reasons. First, depending on how you look at a text, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that taking the author&#8217;s opinion into consideration at all is a critical faux pas; after all, the (ubiquitous) author is (figuratively) dead. But I think I can get away with it for three reasons. First, depending on how you look at a text, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Death of the Animator (Blog Article) &#171; Geek Philosophy, Nerd Profundities</title>
		<link>http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-9056</link>
		<dc:creator>Death of the Animator (Blog Article) &#171; Geek Philosophy, Nerd Profundities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-9056</guid>
		<description>[...] May 19, 2008 by newgeekphilosopher    http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] May 19, 2008 by newgeekphilosopher    <a href="http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/" rel="nofollow">http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serendipity in our semiosis, serendipity in our hermeneutics: The Abundance of Meaning Part 2 &#171; &#8220;Lelangiric&#8221;, or so they say&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-8780</link>
		<dc:creator>Serendipity in our semiosis, serendipity in our hermeneutics: The Abundance of Meaning Part 2 &#171; &#8220;Lelangiric&#8221;, or so they say&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-8780</guid>
		<description>[...] 10, 2008 in Uncategorized   After having read this post, and after observing a certain prevailing trend amongst entries and comments around my familiar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 10, 2008 in Uncategorized   After having read this post, and after observing a certain prevailing trend amongst entries and comments around my familiar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Elevens, Allusions &#171; The Animanachronism</title>
		<link>http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-8767</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Elevens, Allusions &#171; The Animanachronism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-8767</guid>
		<description>[...] ones. The show is just noise and pictures, and it&#8217;s the fans who shove the meaning on it. We&#8217;ve been here before, and we don&#8217;t need to say anything about Code Geass at all - it can just be enjoyed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ones. The show is just noise and pictures, and it&#8217;s the fans who shove the meaning on it. We&#8217;ve been here before, and we don&#8217;t need to say anything about Code Geass at all &#8211; it can just be enjoyed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ef ~a tale of memories~ Series Review: Unforgettable memories @ Mega Megane Moé</title>
		<link>http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>ef ~a tale of memories~ Series Review: Unforgettable memories @ Mega Megane Moé</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 03:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animanachronism.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/death-of-the-animator/#comment-242</guid>
		<description>[...] what is obviously stated, is more than worth the possible issue of going too deep. I&#8217;d rather create something out of nothing, than to find nothing in something. (Although, it must be noted, IKnight argues the opposite, that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what is obviously stated, is more than worth the possible issue of going too deep. I&#8217;d rather create something out of nothing, than to find nothing in something. (Although, it must be noted, IKnight argues the opposite, that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
